In silly, over-the-top, disconnected from reality overtly
political statements for the day the President of the United States of America
makes his pitch for raising tax rates on families with incomes more than
$250,000 per year:
Taking the President’s words as literal, in his apparent
understanding, Americans are supposed to think that because he supports raising
taxes on a minority segment of the population, that those who do not think that
raising anyone’s tax rates is economically sound are taking the rest of the population
hostage because he will not support legislation maintaining all current tax
rates. Seems a bit like projection.
The much derided “Bush” tax cuts of the early 2000’s are, as
they have during President Obama’s entire misguided presidency, the object of
much deranged scrutiny. Never mind that they have been the tax rates for nearly
10 years, actually resulted in increases in revenue collected year to year and
maintained a progressive rate of taxation by income level (higher rates on
higher income), these tax rates haunt political discussion like some kind of
chupacabra of the fevered liberal mind.
The President was once asked if he would seek these kinds of
increases even if they led to decreased revenue generation and he answered in
the affirmative, under the auspices of “fairness”. Fairness being a word whose
definition has been twisted to the point of being basically meaningless because
it seems to mean anything to anyone. The plea to the majority is further
discouraging because it illustrates a problem with direct democracy, don’t the
minority of taxpayers deserve some kind of protection from confiscatory tax
rates enabled by a majority? To some, there is no tax rate too high on and no
problem that cannot be solved with other people’s money. How it is considered “fair”
for one erstwhile “free” citizen to pay so much more, as a percentage of their
lawfully earned gains, of the government’s activities than others is going to
be a determining factor in this year’s election. Those who can conceive this as
“fair” should not be surprised as the population of chupacabras shrinks; one
wonders who or what they’ll blame next.
No comments:
Post a Comment