Being partisan as I am the President’s shtick on private
equity and Mitt Romney’s work within that industry does nothing more than
incite eye-rolling. However, I am starting to think that as the President’s
campaign seems to coalesce about the notion that Romney is unfit to be
President because of his work in private equity that more and more people will
tire of this shtick as well. I think this because the President’s notion
consists of simple invective statements repeated very often that require listeners
to be uncurious and accepting. Over time it’s reasonable to think that many of
these listeners will eventually be introduced to competing assertions and even
seek them out.
They might wonder why it is that the President’s campaign is
centered about the qualifications of his opponent and not about what it is that
he has done over his term to deserve re-election and what policies he would pursue
in a second term and how they would benefit the citizens of this country. Additionally,
they might wonder qualifications the President has to credibly discuss the
machinations of private equity and Romney’s record in the industry?
Next, they might contemplate the President’s conceptualization
of private equity. How could any business make money by bankrupting companies?
The simplistic idea of loading on debt and then exiting might seem believable
but how exactly would that work and why would any lender continue to issue debt
to a company that took out loans and then defaulted? It might be infuriating to
learn that private equity firms focus on profit and not on the number of jobs
created. But then consider, what is profit; crudely defined as revenue minus
costs? How can profit even exist without some good or service being sold by a
company invested in by private equity? And how could those goods or services
exist without employees creating and managing them? At best the President might
be able to convince some that job creation is incidental to business plans.
This view does not change the fact that jobs result from offering more services
and goods (which is how profits increase). They might learn that private equity
firms target declining businesses and wonder what would happen to those
businesses if not invested in by private equity. They might wonder how a
declining businesses can continue without investment and contemplate the affect
on jobs should a declining business cease to exist.
After thinking about business and determining that it just
doesn’t make any sense for a company to make money by bankrupting companies
over and over again. After coming to the conclusion that business make money by
selling things and that those things require workers to offer and create them. They
might consider Mitt Romney as a successful businessman who led a private equity
firm, Bain Capital, which still exists and has invested in many businesses that
are still around today making money by selling things to people that are made
by other people. Finally, once they realize these things they might just
realize that the President’s campaign is implausible.
No comments:
Post a Comment